Monday, October 13, 2014

The Destructive Male Rhetorical Analysis, Miffy Riley

In The Destructive Male, Elizabeth Cady Stanton effectively conveys her argument against the sole suffrage of men by using rhetoric to demonstrate how the destructive nature of man can only be tempered in society by the natural, loving, and peaceful forces that women represent and protect.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton starts off stating the main objective right away, asserting to her immediate audience of both men and women, “I urge a sixteenth amendment.” Her sheer courage and upfront honesty make her a powerful force that demands respect from the very start. She boldly characterizes the male as “a destructive force, stern, selfish, aggrandizing, loving war, violence, conquest…breeding in the material and moral world discord, disorder, disease, and death.” The extremely condescending diction Stanton uses to approach the problem of males appeals to the pathos of a certain audience, painting a savage and unrestrained picture of men while building up emotions against them. She provides credibility to her forceful diatribes by beseeching the audience to “see what a record of blood and cruelty the pages of history reveal”, providing a logical connection between the evil nature of men the terrible injustices of the past. She argues the overpowering societal male influence “crush[es] out all the diviner qualities in human nature,”  and while undergoing the struggle of human history “mercy has veiled her face and all hearts have been dead alike to love and hope”. Using personification, Stanton elicits an understanding of how detrimental male guidance has been to the growth, hope, and happiness of civilization while providing enough passion to stir the audience’s emotions.

Stanton then addresses the effects of the influence of men on the ways of women. She speaks to the pathos of those who understand oppression, stating that “the strong, natural characteristics of womanhood are repressed and ignored”. She argues that men have changed the women condition, that to be respected in society women must “be as near like man as possible, reflect his ideas, opinions, virtues, motives, prejudices, and vices”. The phrase “she must” is repeated, bringing attention to the unfairness and pathos to the demoralizing situation that women have been subjected to. Through logos Stanton demonstrates her greater understanding of how society functions and is thus able to advocate for change in the way women are allowed to be free.

Stanton provides a defined solution to the problems of society, allowing the argument to fully form and influence her audience. She argues the “need of the hour” is not technological advancements or money, but instead “a new evangel of womanhood”. She depicts this womanhood as “purity, virtue, morality, true religion, to lift man up into the higher realms of thought and action.” Once again, she creates a powerful diction to define a term, “womanhood”, yet this time it is extremely positive, trusting, and speaks of a higher world, prompting curiosity and inspiration from the audience.


Stanton’s final point uses logos to reinforce reasons for an equal and balanced society. Since there is “violence and disturbance in the natural world,” therefore there must be a “constant effort to maintain an equilibrium of forces.” Using the simile that nature is “like a loving mother,” Stanton argues for the peace that only a natural balance of extremes can fix. Driving her point home, she creates a logical syllogism—if the world is corrupt and unbalanced due to manly influences, and if through nature we see the only way to fix disorder is through balance, then it must be that a government of the best men and women would “better represent the whole and protect the interests of all” than either sex alone.

No comments:

Post a Comment